Monthly Archives: October 2014

General

Jury Duty…

Yesterday was the second time in the past five or so years I’ve been called in to Jury Duty.

What I most recall from the first time was that I wound up sitting in the “waiting room” from when I arrived at approximately 7:45 A.M. and waiting…and waiting…and waiting…

During the course of that day maybe ten groups were called in to various trails.  Many of those folks returned.  One particularly unlucky guy was picked out and returned to the waiting room at least three times, I’m assuming each time being discarded from potential trials only to be re-selected and sent back to another one.

By close to 5 P.M., the alleged time we’re supposed to be “freed”, I had yet to be called and thought (along with “what a waste of a day”) that that would be it for me.

It wasn’t.

With only minutes to spare before five, the lady on the speaker says something to the effect of “Everyone who hasn’t been called until now, please come to the front.”  She then read off each juror number, including mine, and off we went downstairs to get scrutinized for a trail.

For over an hour the prosecutor and defense asked us questions and, in the end, I along with several others wasn’t picked, which was something of a saving grace considering the hour.  It was close to 7 P.M. and I had the impression the judge wanted to go forward with that particular trial then and there, figuring it would only take another hour or so to do so (it involved some youth that was arrested on Miami Beach for something or another).

But…what a wasted day.

Anyway, the second go around proved a lot more “exciting”.  There appeared to be far fewer people in the jury pool waiting room than before and, by the time they reached the fifth batch of summoned potential jurors, I had a feeling my number would be up.

It was.  At close to 11 A.M. (Unlike the last time I sat around only three hours) I was called in with another 34 people and off we went…

…to be continued!

Books/Literature

On creativity…

I don’t often post about “upcoming” projects because they have a way taking on a life of their own while unfolding in slow motion.  What I say at one point might well be invalidated by what happens a week, a month, or even several months down the line.

Similarly, it is difficult, especially in the early goings of writing whatever is my latest novel, to predict a time when said work will be “done”.  For Ghost of the Argus, the fifth and concluding chapter to the initial “larger” Corrosive Knights saga, I figured going in the novel would take around a year to write, revise, and release, which was approximately the time it took me to write my previous novels.

That initial assessment wound up being overly optimistic as the novel took twice as long, two years, to finish up.

Ghost of the Argus

The reason?  Unlike the other books in the series, I wanted this one to give the readers a lot more.  It had to have a great conclusion to that initial Corrosive Knights story line while featuring new and familiar characters all doing interesting things and not simply standing around.

It is perhaps because of the intensity and length of time involved in writing that book that, shortly before putting the very final touches on it and while driving home one day, the next book in the Corrosive Knights series came to me almost completely.  Bear in mind, up until that moment I had absolutely no idea where I would take this series following Ghost of the Argus.  Further, whenever ideas come to me for books, I usually start with a beginning and end and have to figure out the middle the hard way.  Here, the novel’s near entirety had appeared to me like a fever dream.

But it didn’t stop there.  A couple of weeks later, after beginning that novel, I had the idea for a novel that should precede it.  In this case, a more typical creative process occurred.  I had my start and ending and needed to write the middle.  However, it was clear to me this book would appear as Corrosive Knights #6 while my fever dream novel would be #7.

Which meant I was now writing two novels instead of one.

But there’s more!

Previously I mentioned that I had the concluding Corrosive Knights novel in a rough/framework format and wanted to get that one done -at least have a solid first draft- as well.  So I have three novels in the works.

A week ago, another thought came to mind.  There is a story in my short story collection Shadows at Dawn that I’ve always felt needed to be expanded into a full novel.  Once completed, this novel would stand alone and be unrelated to the Corrosive Knights series.  Frankly, after writing five Corrosive Knights books and having #’s 6, 7, and (a potential) 8 in the works, I longed to write something unrelated to that series.  So strong were my ideas that I rushed to the computer and started writing.  Next thing I knew, I had four potential books in the works.

Shadows at Dawn CoverI can’t help but think that the intensity and focus of work on Ghost of the Argus was so all consuming that once that novel was done and my mind was freed up, the story ideas roared out.

So that’s where I am, working on four different novels at the same time.  My plan, subject to change, is as follows: I’m going to write a strong first draft of each of these books, alternating my time each day to focus on them and not get “locked in” on any one.  Once I have the first drafts done, we’ll see which of the four books I decide to polish up and finish off (my guess at this point is it will either be the stand alone story or what will be Corrosive Knights book #6).  If I really get moving, there might be several novels available a lot quicker than they were before.

I’m keeping my fingers crossed that this will be the case!

 

 

Movies

Oculus (2013) a (mildly) belated review

Star power propelled me to want to see the 2013 horror film Oculus and, sadly, it proved to be just about the only reason to see this film.

Putting together -though they never actually share any screen time together, other than one little “portrait” piece towards the end- cult favorites Karen Gillian (the lovable Amy Pond on Doctor Who) and Katee Sackhoff (the tough as nails “Starbuck” from the Battlestar: Galactica remake series), you figure that if nothing else, having these two in the mix you’d have something worth watching.

Unfortunately, in the end the answer is no.

Not that Ms. Gillian and Sackhoff did a bad job.  They didn’t.  What let them down, what always seems to let films down, lies in the script.

A while back, I reviewed the Scarlett Johannsen film Under the Skin (if you’re curious, you can read the full review here).  I noted that the filmmakers were clearly going for a Stanley Kubrick-like “vibe”, but noted that:

Unfortunately, when one sees so many familiar echoes to the brilliant works of other artists, one can’t help but compare them to Under the Skin.  Doing so, even more unfortunately, reveals that this film doesn’t quite live up to what came before.

And this, my friends, winds up being the exact same problem with Oculus, for Oculus is essentially Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining, only switching a haunted hotel with a haunted mirror and having the in-danger siblings presented both in the present and via flashbacks that become, perhaps, illusions crafted by the mirror.  (It’s worth noting that The Shining also had an element of time/flashback to it, of the 1920’s and the then present 1980)

Good or bad, The Shining benefited tremendously from Jack Nicholson’s robust, sometimes waaaaaay over the top turn as the homicidal father.  Actor Rory Cochrane, as the homicidal father of Oculus, unfortunately enters and exits the film as an emotional enigma.  Before he goes “crazy”, he appears aloof and distant and therefore one cares very little about him.  When he goes crazy, he’s still aloof and distant, only now he’s carrying a handgun.

The plot of Oculus goes something like this: The modern day siblings, particularly Kaylie Russell (Karen Allen), want to prove that the horrifying things they went through as children were caused by this evil mirror her late father brought into the house.  To prove this Kaylie sets about going all scientific, recording everything and sprinkling alarms to remind them of the actual time and break the mirror’s illusions.

But the mirror, of course, has other things in mind.

The first hour or so of the film isn’t too bad.  Unfortunately, the movie hits its peak early on and kinda coasts along, never really building any more tension or intrigue until it reaches its downbeat and very stupid ending (who was shocked, shocked when the item Kaylie set up over the mirror wound up –gasp!– not doing what it was intended to?)

Anyway, a pass, despite the most interesting cast.

Books/Literature, Comic Books/Graphic Novels, Movies

Wanna get depressed?

Then by all means read this article from the normally very humorous Cracked.com, 3 Artists Who Got Screwed For Creating Iconic Characters:

http://www.cracked.com/blog/3-famous-characters-whose-creators-got-epically-screwed/

Though familiar with most of the creators described, I wasn’t aware of the Dwayne “The Rock” Hercules film being based on the writings of Steve Moore, though it doesn’t at all surprise me that like the other creators listed, he got nothing for his creative work when his work was translated into a film.

One thing that remains a certainty regarding all this: It’s all about the money.

When I first started getting into comic books in the very early 1970’s and over the years afterwards, one of the joys of reading books was the introduction of new, interesting (and sometimes not so interesting) characters.  They could be heroes or villains, civilians or aliens or something in between.  These new characters appeared in established books, often as co-stars or potential new rivals.  Sometimes the companies publishing the works felt strongly enough about the new character(s) that they merited their own book.

While many of those creations didn’t “click” with audiences either right away or at all, there were those that rose to starring roles.  Some, like Rocket Raccoon in the motion picture Guardians of the Galaxy, were essentially forgotten for decades before becoming popular.

Things changed in the mid to late 1980’s and into the 1990’s.  At that time comic book sales were very strong (though not as strong as in the Golden Age of the 1940’s) and some artists and writers made huge amounts of money from their works.  But at about that same time fans and creators alike realized many of the creators from the past, perhaps most notably Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster (the creators of Superman) and Jack Kirby (the creator/co-creator of almost everything Marvel), were shafted.  Despite companies making buckets of cash off their creations, these creators wound up receiving next to nothing.

At about that time, and with that realization, I noticed that “new” characters didn’t appear in comic books with the frequency they had before.  Sure, books kept being released, but the stories were more recycled and hardly ever featured new and interesting characters.  Because of the success of the Independent market, some big and not so big name authors and artists chose to release original stories featuring new creations that way, ensuring they retained control over their creative works.

Nonetheless, both Marvel and DC comics has benefited from, quite literally, over a half-century of creative works that were remained under their control.  And, in the case of the already mentioned Rocket Raccoon, this was a boon to Disney/Marvel…while Bill Mantlo, the creator of the character, was entitled to nothing.

But there is an interesting flip side to this particular coin.  If the studios can get away with using creations by (to the general public) unknown creators, they will also not hesitate in using the name of a “well known” creator to promote a work…if it helps create more exposure and money.

Witness the SyFy Network TV show Haven.  While not on the level with, say The Prisoner (one of my all time favorite TV shows), Haven is to me a very entertaining show featuring a scenic town and the oddball things that happen within it.  The leads are charismatic, the stories interesting, and I catch it whenever new episodes air.

Oh, and by the way, the show is “based on” The Colorado Kid, a novel by Stephen King.  What has the TV show to do with the novel?

Just about nothing.

In fact, other than a couple of characters work in the small town’s newspaper and something happened a few years before, there isn’t all that much resemblance between King’s novel and the TV show, yet it would be crazy for the producers of the show not to mention now and again the fact that the show is “based on” the King novel.

In the end, its all about money, right?

Music

Just listening…

I’m often fascinated with songs and their remakes.  To my mind, the most successful remake of a song is Jimi Hendrix’s version of Bob Dylan’s All Along the Watchtower.

The original Bob Dylan version:

The Jimi Hendrix version:

’nuff said.

But there are cases where original songwriters have written songs and subsequently given them to others to record.  Sometimes those recordings prove to be very popular.

Mott the Hoople’s All The Young Dudes was written -and I believe features some background vocals- by David Bowie.  Perhaps the most fascinating thing about the song is that, according to Mr. Bowie, it was originally intended to be included in the Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars album!

Mr. Bowie would go on to perform that song many times in concert.  He even recorded his own version(s) of it.  To my ears while they may be good, Mott the Hoople version still feels like the definitive version:

Now check out Sorcerer, a song sung/recorded by Marilyn Martin but written by Stevie Nicks.  It originally appeared in the 1984 film Streets of Fire:

It would appear Stevie Nicks remembered and liked the song enough to “take it back” in 2001, recording and releasing her own version in the album Trouble in Shangri-La:

Unlike All the Young Dudes, I can’t decide which version of Sorcerer I like more.

Interesting stuff, to my mind!