Why Should A Writer Retire?

Absolutely brilliant short essay by Jimmy So for Newsweek that touches upon a subject near and dear to me, the actual “work” involved in writing:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/06/26/why-should-a-writer-retire.html

For me, writing falls very much in the category of work.  Heavy, often frustrating and almost always mentally draining work.  The moments are few when I don’t think about skipping the work of the day/hour and getting out of my chair to “take it easy”.  Yet there is another huge chunk of me, paradoxically, that looks upon the works I’ve already done and is so damn proud of them and craves and encourages and demands I continue working and get even more books or short stories out there.

To be a writer, you have to be disciplined and willing to spend long hours alone in your mind, often being a harsh task master and culling the good ideas from the all too frequent bad ones.  And then, once you’ve got that magical first draft done, you switch roles and become your own harshest critic, dissecting each work and sentence and paragraph and chapter over and over and over again until you finally feel your work is ready to be released.

Once released, you can enjoy your accomplishment….at least for a minute or two.  Its not too long before that voice in the back of your head tells you to get working on your next story…and make this one better than the last, OK?

Which is my cue to get back to the latest book of the Corrosive Knights saga, sitting in the hard drive patiently waiting for me to get to her…

Enough with the TV Anti-Heroes…

First, sorry once again for the dearth of blog entries.  Vacation was spent far from easy internet access and, thus, there was little time or opportunity to get online.  On the other hand, seeing (and hearing!) glaciers first hand was an incredible, once in a lifetime -unless I were to go back or the glaciers melt away!- experience.  Highly recommended.

Now, onwards…!

The following link is to an article by June Thomas and is posted on Slate magazine.  At its surface it concerns the new Showtime series Ray Donovan but of course addresses something far more populous (perhaps too populous) in today’s TV, the “anti”-hero:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/07/01/the_tv_anti_hero_from_tony_soprano_to_ray_donovan_why_so_many_and_when_will.html

A personal story which I recounted before:  A long, very long time ago, when I was a very young child, for whatever reason I developed a strong sense of what a “good guy” and a “bad guy” were.  To my mind, a “good guy’s” characteristics were not unlike the old-time serial westerns.  You know, white hat, always helpful, never mean, never underhanded, etc. etc.

Boring, I know, but I was maybe six-eight years old and had a mind heavily into comic books and cartoons when I developed that notion.

Along came the TV series The Six-Million Dollar Man and, if you were a young child from that era, you know how popular the series was.  After a trio or so of “pilot” movies, the official series kicked off in January 1974 with the episode “Population Zero“.

I was one of probably millions of viewers that night and absolutely loved the episode…until, that is, the ending.

But let me back up just a moment:  The episode was very much a homage cough:rip-off:cough of Michael Crichton’s Andromeda Strain, at least in its initial sequences involving a small town where seemingly everyone has suddenly, abruptly, died.  To be fair, after that opening premise, the SMDM episode did go its own way.  The small town, it turned out, wasn’t wiped out after all, but somehow the entire population was simultaneously knocked unconscious by some kind of high tech sonic weapon.  The creator of that weapon, it turned out, was a scientist that held a bitter grudge against the government because funds for his weapon were cut in favor of, you guessed it, the Bionic Man program.

The fact that Steve Austin, the man who benefited from the Bionic Man program -indeed was the Bionic Man program, gets involved in the case turns out to be more of a coincidence than it probably should have been, but our hero investigates the situation and is eventually captured by the bad guys who, because they know about his abilities, also know his weaknesses.  The lead villain orders Austin put into a large meat freezer.  His bionic limbs are vulnerable to extreme cold and, therefore, this would be the way they would get rid of him.

So Steve Austin is locked in the freezer and the villains head off to a mountain range, intent on using their weapon on another town, upset the government hasn’t paid them their ransom demands and intent on pushing the settings of their sonic weapon from “stun unconscious” to “kill”.

Meanwhile, Steve Austin breaks out of the cooler and, in one of the better sequences of the story, stumbles about, unable to fully use his bionic limbs, desperate to get to the villains before they murder an entire town.  As Austin moves in the sun, his bionic parts limber up and he begins his heroic run, eventually reaching a point where he spots the villain’s van parked a short distance away.

Steve Austin also notes a small square fenced off area and runs to it.  He grabs one of the fence posts and pulls it from the ground, complete with cement block, and runs at the van.  The villains spot him, aim their weapon at him, but before they can eliminate the Bionic Man he hurls the fence post javelin-style at them.  The post slams through the van’s outer wall and the van and villains go up in a ball of explosive flame.  (You can see the entire thing I’ve just described here)

The young child I was back then was very disturbed by Steve Austin’s actions.

As I said before, my idea of a “hero” was pretty strict, and one thing a hero never, ever did was kill.  Especially not in a premeditated fashion.  Yet this is exactly what Steve Austin effectively did.  When he was hurrying to the van, he knew very well the villains needed large amounts of electricity from the power lines around them to juice up their machine.  When he pulled out the metal fence post, could he have flung it at the power lines around the vans and simply disabled their weapon rather than gun for them directly.

But even if the power lines were difficult to get to, how was he to know the villains would spot him as he ran toward them?  Granted, they did, but what if he managed to run up to them and simply rip the power cord between van and power line before they spotted him?

The fact is that Steve Austin pulled that metal post out of the ground with one idea and one idea only:  To use it exactly as he did and hurl it at the van, intent on at the very least hurting and at the most killing all the villains he was up against.

A big no-no to my child’s mind back then.

Today, of course, heroes killing hapless/helpless villains is hardly anything new or startling.  And, going back to the article above, the genre of the “anti-hero” has taken off…and off and off to the point where I’m in agreement with the author that this has become a rather boring -dare I say it- cliche.

That’s not to say that some of the “classic” anti-heroes have lost their luster, only that the most recent batches appear to offer us little in the way of something new.

Who knows.  With the way things have gone thus far, perhaps the next big thing will be the hero I imagined in my youth.

Or might that prove to be a bit too boring in this more cynical age?

Perhaps a little too much free time on their hands…

Interesting article from Huffington Post regarding Pastor Keith Cressman and his lawsuit over…an image on the Oklahoma license plate?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/17/pastor-suit-against-oklahoma-license-plate-ok_n_3455129.html

So, basically, we have an image based on a famous sculpture which in turn was based on an Native American Indian Rain God and this, to the Pastor, infringes upon his sensibilities as it depicts a “Pagan” God.

In Florida, my home state, one can get a wide variety of vanity plates with images ranging from nature scenes, aquatic scenes, John Lennon (!), to, yes, religious statements (here’s a bunch of images).  It wouldn’t surprise me if one day people in this state are allowed to create their own license plate images, provided they aren’t deemed offensive, and slap them on their car…for a fee, of course.  Apparently, in Oklahoma like Florida there are other plates available, but like Florida these require an additional payment.

Still, the Pastor’s discomfort with the standard Oklahoma license plate smacks of frivolous and silly and one can’t help but feel the Pastor is a little too tightly wound up.  In the Oklahoma license plate I don’t see a promotion of “Pagan” religion (especially “Pagan” rain Gods) so much as a tribute to Native American Heritage.

The Pastor may want to take a few deep breaths.

Is Hollywood Broken?

In the past few days, I’ve stumbled upon a pair of interesting articles regarding the well being (or, more accurately, potential very bad being) of the movie industry.  The first dark warnings come from the views of Steven Spielberg and George Lucas.  They talk about what they feel is an impending financial “implosion” that’s about to occur in the industry:

http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/lucas-spielberg-on-future-of-entertainment-1200496241/

One person very snarkily pointed out that the thoughts of Mr. Spielberg and Lucas were not unlike a person who murders their parents and then pleads for leniency from the police/courts because s/he was now an orphan.

I wouldn’t go quite that far.  While much of the modern Hollywood blockbuster mentality does indeed derive -for better or worse- from the careers of Mr. Spielberg and Lucas, the ills plaguing the movie industry they describe are also technological in nature, including Netflix, Video on Demand (VOD), etc, all of which were hard to predict many years before.  Still, the “blockbuster” mentality, I would agree, is part of the problem.

This second article, by Lynda Obst and presented as an excerpt from her book, can be found on Salon.com.  In this exerpt, Ms. Obst notes how the decline of the DVD selling industry has been a very hard blow to the movie industry:

http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/lynda_obst_hollywoods_completely_broken/

I find this a fascinating topic.  Again, Netfix and VOD are probably “guilty”, if that’s the right word, for at least part of the decline of the DVD/BluRay market.

But I think there’s more to it than that.

I’ve pointed out before how I jumped into the laserdisc market because it offered something the video market hadn’t until that point:  Movies in their proper aspect ratio and, often, extras that you couldn’t find elsewhere.  At first, you’d get simple things like trailers.  Soon, “cut” scenes were included as well as documentaries.  I bought a lot of laserdiscs, but for the most part that was in the early days, when I wanted to get my hands on certain films.  As the laserdisc industry was dying and the DVD market was starting to grow, my buying habits of laserdiscs had already dropped considerably.  Not because I was desperate to jump into the DVD market, but because I had most of the films I wanted.

At least those available on laserdisc.

When DVDs really started to become big, an avalanche of other films and -big time joy!- TV shows I desperately wanted but couldn’t find on laserdisc were suddenly available.  Thus, I only too happily transitioned to DVDs and, because they were so much cheaper to buy than laserdiscs, wound up not only bought the newly available films/TV shows but also replaced most of my laserdisc collection.

By the time the BluRay format came along, I was once again in the same situation as with the laserdiscs.  My buying habits had slowed considerably because, again, I had the films/TV shows I wanted.  Nonetheless, the HD draw was big.  There were certain films I had no problems at all re-buying in this format to get the clearest, most beautiful presentation of them.

But many of the TV shows and lesser films I had purchased were fine “as is” and I didn’t bother buying new versions of them.  Once again, I’m in the same situation I was in two times before:  I have most of the stuff I truly want.  There are very few films/TV shows out there I’m desperate to buy and keep in my personal collection.

Worse, I’m finding the newer films to be more spectacle than classically re-watchable.  Mind you, some new films are quite good and I enjoyed watching them, whether it be in the theater or via Netflix or VOD.  But seeing them once is sufficient.  Yes, I enjoyed Iron Man, The Avengers, Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol, and, most recently, Star Trek Into Darkness.

Yet as much as I enjoyed watching them, I have little interest in revisiting them.  On the other hand, I could pull out my copy of The Maltese Falcon or Bullitt or Duel or Jaws or Airplane! or Blade Runner or Metropolis or…you get the picture, and watch them over and over again.

These are the films I want to have in my collection but the fact is that there are only so many of them I strongly desire.  The rest may entertain me but I don’t need to have them.  And once I buy the best copy available of said films, whether it be some spectacular new BluRay special edition, there is little reason for me to buy them again.

Thus, I believe at least part of the reason there is a serious decline in DVD/BluRay sales is this.  For better or worse, the DVD/BluRay format is, like CDs before it, so permanent that there is little need to purchase a movie several times and there are only so many films out there you really, really need to have as a collector.

The bottom line, of course, is that this hurts the movie industry.  Whenever a big source of revenue dries up, it can’t help but to do that.

Ah the verbal gymnastics…

Though I loath to get too political in this blog, the following news item is just a little too much.

So a bunch of -for the most part- Republican Senators managed to kill a bill that allowed for background checks for gun purchases, a relatively minor and common sense (both in my opinion) proposed law that should have been enacted (again in my opinion) ages ago on the grounds that it was an invasion of personal privacy.

Yet these same people are now defending the NSA spying.  When asked about the inherent contradiction of voting against gun buyers’ background checks -because they supposedly invade personal privacy- and defending the NSA spying -which essentially does the same on a much, much larger scale even though it is in the fight against terrorism- they reply that the two issues are very different and comparing them is like comparing “apples and oranges”.

Really.

Read for yourself…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/12/nsa-senators_n_3428074.html

I’ve noted it before and I’ll note it again:  The internet and the digital revolution has created a vast new world, one where we’re only now beginning to see the potentially massive changes in how we and future generations will live our lives.  Already some of the changes are obvious, from the extinction (for all intents and purposes) of both the video and music store -and coming soon, the extinction of the book store- thanks to online shopping to the fact that companies -not just the government!- now have a wealth of personal information on just about everyone out there which, in turn, leads to programs such as the NSA.

Am I against the NSA program?

It’s tough to form an opinion when I know so little about it.  All I do know is that, again thanks to our new information age, it is suddenly much easier for an individual -any individual with access- to spill government secrets with the ease of clicking a button.  The scary thing is this:  In their zeal to expose what they believe is government overreach or possible corruption, could they be putting other people in danger?  If the NSA program has been successful in stopping potential terrorist activity, will the exposure of same -and the potential of terrorists to circumvent what they now know the U.S. government is doing- endanger us?  If, heaven forbid, a major terrorist strike occurs in the U.S. or in any friendly nation and scores of people are killed, and we find that the terrorists used the NSA leak to work their way around our security…then what?

But let’s look at the opposite side of the coin as well:  What if the massive information the NSA collects is used by individuals to enrich/enpower themselves?  If someone could look into the emails of big corporations and gain insight into their next moves, could they not use that information for themselves?  And we’re not even talking about potential blackmail material, such the possibility of discovering that a certain CEO likes to hop onto certain pornographic websites or has made incriminating statements in an email…

I’ll repeat it one last time:  The internet has changed things on a massive scale.  The information age is upon us and privacy isn’t what it used to be, for better or worse.

This Is The Last Time I Will Ever See You…

Fascinating -and sad- article by David Plotz for Slate Magazine concerning a phenomena I know only too well:  What happens to all those close friends you had at your side when you got married?  How many of them have subsequently faded from your life?

http://www.slate.com/articles/life/weddings/2013/06/wedding_guest_goodbyes_friendships_that_end_after_your_wedding.html

I’m most certainly in Mr. Plotz’s camp.  Should I take a look at my old wedding pictures, there most certainly will be a number of people there I see very, very infrequently.  Some are due to moving out of our area (indeed, the majority of those are due to this) while I’ve simply drifted apart from others.

Perhaps because marriage (and what follows, from your work to having children, etc.) represents such a big change in one’s previous, non-married life it should not be too surprising that people move away from each other.

Yet there is an undeniable sadness to that realization, to seeing as Mr. Plotz put it, “ghosts” of your past, people you once were great friends with but now are not.

More Screen Junkies…

Still hanging around the website and found this intriguing -and humorous- little article by Penn Collins regarding roles offered, but rejected, by Al Pacino:

http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-news/al-pacino-passed-on-playing-han-solo-and-john-mcclane-in-die-hard/

I can sorta/kinda see him being considered, at the time, for the role of Han Solo in Star Wars.  I can also picture him in the Richard Gere role in Pretty Woman.  (That’s not to take away the acting by the respective parties that did work in these films…the movies clearly owed a great deal of success to the acting of Mr. Harrison and Gere)

But John McClane in Die Hard?!?

Whoa.

That’s a tough one to wrap your head around.

I’ve mentioned it before and, given the topic, it bears repeating:  One of my favorite “what if” roles is that of Dirty Harry, the movie that arguably moved Clint Eastwood from rising star to MEGAstar.  The titular role was originally being groomed for…Frank Sinatra.  He passed and other actors, from Robert Mitchum to Paul Newman to Burt Lancaster were considered for the role before Mr. Eastwood took it.

What if, indeed.

Death on the set…

A rather ghoulish list, from Screen Junkies, concerning five movies in which cast or crew died while the project was being made:

http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/death-on-set-5-movies-that-someone-died-while-making/

I was aware of most of the mentioned works, particularly those whose lead actors died while making the film, Brandon Lee in The Crow and Vic Morrow in The Twilight Zone: The Movie.  Both deaths, indeed all the deaths mentioned here were tragedies yet it is interesting to note the hows and whys of each of them, some more grisly than the others.

If there is one positive aspect to all this is the fact that the most “recent” of the listed tragedies occurred back in 1994, nearly twenty years ago.  One hopes that those who work on film/TV projects have opted for better security.

Living on Mars…

Absolutely fascinating article by Michael Chorost for Slate magazine regarding the problems astronauts face if/when humans head to Mars for a long term -even a multi-generational- stay:

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/06/mars_colonization_may_require_earth_soil.single.html

Clearly, there are considerable problems to overcome in simply leaving Earth’s atmosphere, much less deciding to inhabit a foreign object such as Mars, and this article goes reasonably deep into the crucial issue of the difficulties involved in feeding astronauts.  There are other difficulties to overcome, for sure, such as establishing a reliable source of breathable ai and countering the effects of weightlessness (or lower gravity).  Then there is the issue of your habitation and the elevated levels of radiation your target, in this case Mars, may have.

It would seem that whatever journey is taken to Mars at this stage -and for the near foreseeable future- would have to be something relatively brief, with the crew of a theoretical Earth spacecraft journeying to Mars, staying a short time (during which they use up their supplies) and then heading right back.

But a journey of 4-10 months one way is an awful long time and requires a great deal of nutrients/water and supplies.  The crew of this theoretical flight would have few options if any sort of difficulty/emergency, medical or otherwise, should arise.  They would effectively be on their own and would have to deal with whatever comes up on their own.

I’m convinced space travel will become, over time, a more routine and safe process, not unlike the journeys from the “old world” to the “new” one eventually became.  Perhaps the solution is not to aim for Mars but to train for that eventual journey by going to -and establishing a colony on- the Moon.  It is far closer to us and thus presents a potentially safer training ground, a place where we can carefully practice, refine, and hopefully perfect long term space journeys and the equipment necessary to make it so.

Still, fascinating, fascinating stuff.

You won’t finish this article…

…though you probably should.

A fascinating piece by Farhad Manjoo for Slate magazine regarding the reading patterns of people with regard to articles on the web.  His findings?  Not all that many people bother to read an article from the beginning all the way to the end…

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/06/how_people_read_online_why_you_won_t_finish_this_article.single.html

I’m not at all surprised by his findings.  More and more I’m convinced we live in a world of hyper-stimulation.

Nowadays, you want to see an older TV show?  Download complete seasons or order the same via DVDs/BluRays.  Want to read something, from books to comics?  Almost everything is available via Amazon nowadays, just download it in seconds and you’re there.  Want to hear certain music?  Again, download it via Amazon or iTunes in seconds and you’ve got it.  Want news?  There are hundreds of websites available for any manner of news you may be looking for.

In the past, we didn’t have this near instantaneous (and, arguably, overwhelming) source of information that is the internet.  Back then, we had to hunt out older works to enjoy them, be they TV shows (I distinctly recall spending some Saturday and Sunday mornings searching through the few channels available on TV hoping to find re-runs of the original Star Trek or The Wild Wild West and being delighted when such episodes actually aired…never mind which particular episodes the stations deemed to show), movies (like TV shows, in the days before video tape, DVD, and now Blu-Ray, your only hope to catch older favorites was to, again, stumble upon them while channel surfing), books (you picked up whatever was available at the local bookstore, used bookstore, or library), and music (again limited to whatever your local record/music store carried).

Is it any wonder, as Mr. Manjoo points out…

Maybe this is just our cultural lot: We live in the age of skimming. I want to finish the whole thing, I really do. I wish you would, too. Really—stop quitting! But who am I kidding. I’m busy. You’re busy. There’s always something else to read, watch, play, or eat.

There’s always something else to read, watch, play, or eat.  Indeed there is.

The Blog of E. R. Torre