Category Archives: TV

Interested in Amazon’s latest pilots…?

Here’s a good review of the latest batch of them, from James Poniewozik for Time Magazine:

http://time.com/3670536/amazon-new-pilots-review-man-in-the-high-castle/

Of the ones mentioned, the one that intrigues me the most is The Man In The High Castle.  Based on a story by Phillip K. Dick, the show explores an alternate 1962, where the Nazis and Japanese won WWII and have split the U.S. in two.

The others mentioned, I have to be brutally honest, either mildly (really mildly) appeal to me or don’t at all.  I suspect the odds of me catching any of the others is pretty low.

Speaking of which, anyone else notice we’re living in a hyperentertainment world?  Used to be the amount of entertainment stimulation available to you was very limited.  Nowadays with the internet, cable, DVD/BluRay, Netflix, Red Box, Hulu, Amazon, etc. etc. etc. you have to be picky about exactly what you have time for.  At any given moment you have access to literally thousands of songs, movies, TV shows, books, apps, video games, etc. etc.

For my part I have a very large collection of DVDs/BluRays and it scares me to think how much money I’ve spent over the years buying various features…and how many of them I have yet to see.  Just off the top of my head, I recently picked up X:Men Days of Future Past (have yet to see it), The Long Goodbye (seen it before but wanted to see it again…yet haven’t), Jodorowsky’s Dune (have yet to see it), Breakheart Pass (loved this Charles Bronson film but its been a long time since I’ve seen it and wanted to revisit it), Roshomon (one of the few “classic” Kurasawa films I have yet to see), 8 1/2 (considered one of Fellini’s best films yet one I have yet to see).  And that’s not to mention the various TV series I picked up complete sets of and wanted to see or re-see but haven’t had the time.  Among others, I have the complete series sets of Perry Mason, Mannix, Twilight Zone, Thriller, Farscape, and Battlestar: Galactica.  I’ve seen most of Farscape and Battlestar: Galactica (new series) when they aired, but always wanted to revisit them.  If only I had the time!

Maybe one day when I’m old(er) and retired…

Should you cut the cable cord…?

A question I’ve started to consider of late: Is it time to end my association with cable services?  Because of the many streaming services available, I’ve become more and more curious whether doing so might save me money while still allowing me to see the stuff I want to see.

But if your interest is largely economic (and whose isn’t?), Slate magazine’s Chris Kirk offers a handy online calculator which allows you to check to see how much you might save if you were to cut your cable bill and join those streaming services:

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2015/01/should-i-cut-the-cable-cord-decide-on-streaming-services-with-this-calculator.html

Very interesting food for thought!

Get off my lawn…!

Rather…um…interesting article by Lewis Beale arguing that Star Wars “ruined” science fiction:

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/02/opinion/beale-star-wars/index.html

As you can tell by this blog’s title, I do indeed accuse Mr. Beale of being a fuddy-duddy regarding this article.  And, unlike him, I was never a big Star Wars fan.

For those who haven’t read my blogs before, I was a very ripe 11 years old when the original Star Wars came out in 1977.  I distinctly recall the hysteria at the time and wound up seeing the film to a very packed house upon the very first week of its release.  The theater was filled with other boys roughly my age (it was an early showing) and they were whooping and hollering at every gee-whiz effect and clapping at every near escape…

…and when it was over, the whole experience left me cold.

So cold, in fact, that I didn’t bother seeing Empire Strikes Back when it came to theaters a couple of years later.  It wasn’t until the film aired on TV that I first saw it…and found it was about on par with the original, IMHO, that is to say: It left me cold.

Please don’t think me some kind of snob.

If you like Star Wars and its sequels, more power to you.  I love science ficiton (which should be obvious given my novels) and certainly loved, loved, loved it with a great fervor back in 1977.  Yet Star Wars didn’t connect with me.  I didn’t hate the film, but just didn’t like it all that much.  Different strokes, I suppose.

Fast forward to Mr. Beale’s article and…come on, Mr. Beale.  You seriously think there haven’t been attempts at more serious science fiction in cinema since Star Wars?  The advent of this film and series certainly has had an impact and, yes, I agree that there are many 1940’s-like cliffhanger serials on steroids released nowadays, but there are also plenty of more cerebral sci-fi works.

Most recently we had Interstellar (still in theaters!), but in recent times and on TV there have been works like Battlestar: Galactica and Lost, both series which ended on a whimper yet delivered some fascinating storylines in their prime.  You mention The Matrix but one can list many recent vintage films that weren’t just about action-action-action, movies like Donnie Darko (forget the “director’s cut”) up to last summer’s fabulous Edge of Tomorrow (a film even Tom Cruise haters will surely like).  Even the absolutely unnecessary (and, in my opinion, failed) Robocop remake eerily probed into the idea of how much humanity a person retains when most of his body is gone.

The point is that culture has a tendency to move along and release a broad range of works which you may like and which you may not.  I suspect there will always be the modern version of those old cliffhanger serials just as there will appear works that try to stretch the genre and offer food for thought.

Just because Star Wars was successful and led to many imitators doesn’t mean the genre is ruined.

Spenser: For Hire (1985) a (very) belated TV show review

Waaaay back in 1985 I recall hearing about this new detective show starring the late Robert Urich and based on novels by the then -to me- unknown author Robert B. Parker.  It was called Spenser: For Hire.

Back then I watched the show on and off, liking it but not really loving it.  It was a rather standard detective series but it did feature one thing that, admittedly, made it stand out more than it likely would have: The presence of Avery Brooks as the enigmatic, scene stealing tough guy Hawk.

As with the novel version, Hawk was presented as a dangerous man you simply don’t mess with.  Avery Brooks took the role and ran with it, positively relishing his every scene and delivering dialogue that was filled with as much menace as, at times, mirth.  Robert Urich, for his part, played the “straight” man and to his credit, held his own when opposite the far more flamboyant Hawk.  The show lasted a mere three years before being cancelled (a surprise move, apparently).  Before it was done it spawned the A Man Called Hawk TV series which I never saw but heard changed the character to be a “softer” troubleshooter (Avery Brooks would go on to land the protagonist role in the Star Trek spinoff Deep Space 9).

After Spenser: For Hire’s cancellation, the studios released four TV movies featuring Mr. Urich and Brooks reprising their roles but featuring different actresses playing the role of Sarah Silverman, Spenser’s lover.  For the movies the Boston locale, central to the Spenser stories, was moved to the far more economical Toronto, though I don’t know if the show’s creators attempted to pass Toronto off as Boston (I think they did).

Anyway, long after the show and its sequel movies and spin offs were gone, I found Spenser: For Hire Season 1 on sale via Amazon for a reasonable price and decided to check the show out again.

What I found was interesting, in a time warp kind of way.

Now, I haven’t seen the entire first season yet, but I did watch the pilot and the first two episodes, all of which take up the first DVD disc.

The pilot, “Promised Land“, was an adaptation of Robert B. Parker’s fourth Spenser novel which featured the first appearance of the character of Hawk.  While I haven’t read the novel, it was a wise choice for a pilot episode as we are introduced to the three principle characters and, nicely, aren’t quite sure where Hawk’s loyalties lie.

However, of the three Spenser episodes I saw, this was the least of them as it featured some at times very torturous dialogue (What works on the novel page doesn’t always work when said out loud) and some curious 80’s style filmmaking.  It was the later that amused me.  I started to count the times a character said something “deep” and then the camera slooooowly zoomed into their face.

The mystery itself, involving a runaway wife who, Spenser later finds, is involved in a radical group of two (count ’em two) terrorist women doesn’t seem like such a big thing.  Further, I’m certain in the novel Hawk’s evolution was better presented.  In the pilot Spenser decides for no apparent reason (again, based on what’s in the pilot) to tip Hawk off on a bust, thus ensuring he will get away, and Hawk subsequently becomes his “partner”, of sorts, because of this.

No Room At The Inn“, the very first actual Spenser episode, winds up being a Bullitt homage (calling it a ripoff seems too cruel…and yet).  Spenser is hired to protect a witness against the mob and, in true Bullitt fashion, things aren’t quite what they seem.  Yes, the plot is lifted almost whole from Bullitt, yet the episode was breezy enough to enjoy…provided you weren’t too hung up on the overly familiar plot.

The next episode, “The Choice” features a psychopathic young duo who get their kicks killing random people, but who are drawn to Spenser’s world when they realize they need to up their game.  What’s most fascinating about that episode proves to be the first screen appearance of Patricia Clarkson, who would go on from here to have quite a career in film and TV.  She plays one half of the psychopathic young duo and isn’t all that bad in her role.  Interestingly, this episode also features early appearances by William H. Macy and Angela Bassett.

In sum, I enjoyed what I saw.  True, my opinion of the series didn’t entirely change.  I wound up liking what I saw but not really loving it.  On the other hand, I didn’t feel like I was wasting my time.  Speaking of which, if I should find the free time, I’ll give the other episodes a look-see.

Should be fun

Gotham (2014) a pilot review

So I finally got to sit down and see the pilot episode of Gotham, the TV series whose focus is on a young detective James Gordon as he starts working for the Gotham City P.D. and, concurrently, Thomas and Martha Wayne are murdered and future Batman Bruce Wayne is left an orphan…

…and I thought it was “ok”.

Prequels to very popular works, in my opinion, are a tricky thing.  Let’s face it, audiences don’t want to see a young James Gordon going up against the crime syndicates, they want to see BATMAN.  They want to see the Dark Knight go up against the colorful villains.  If they want to see James Gordon, they’re perfectly happy to have him appear here and there and give Batman back up.  Otherwise, give us MORE BATMAN.

So that’s, in my opinion, what Gotham is up against.  Will audiences ultimately feel the story of Batman’s police sidekick in his “early years” be interesting enough to make us forget the fact that we’re not going to see Batman himself?  (Unless, of course, there’s a “very special” Halloween episode of Gotham the young Bruce Wayne dresses up in a costume eerily similar to the one he will wear as an adult)

In lieu of Batman, will we be interested in seeing the rise of the Penguin, the Riddler, and Catwoman?  Those three, along with a couple of other potential future Bat-villains (we did see a candidate for the role of the Joker, right?!) all appear in this pilot.  It is clear the writers behind this series scrutinized the comic book stories as there are plenty of very familiar names/characters to be seen, including the show’s co-star, one slovenly -and corrupt- detective Harvey Bullock.

As much as I admire the writers’ diligence in getting all these characters to the screen, I can’t help but wonder if there’s enough “there” there to keep me interested in watching.

Mind you, I believe it can be done, but perhaps the producers and writers should ignore the obvious path of exploring the “early” years of all those Batman villains and instead go for stories that feature unique and new characters.  After all, we know what’s eventually going to become of the Penguin, the Riddler, and Catwoman.  How about instead of dealing with them we’re shown interesting new villains.  Villains who in some ways are the prototypes for the better known Batman villains?

This way Detective Gordon could be shown succeeding in “cleaning up” the streets of Gotham, yet when he’s older a new wave of villains show up and these have to be dealt with by different means…

That could be interesting.

Regardless, I can’t say the single hour I spent with Gotham was a bust.  I’m certainly intrigued enough with what I saw to give it a little more time.  For now, we’ll see…

You know you’re curious…!

5 Things You Probably Never Knew About The Brady Bunch:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/26/brady-bunch-trivia-_n_5846402.html

At this point in time, you probably have to be someone in and around my age to understand the whole “Brady Bunch” thing.  Like Star Trek and Gilligan’s Island, The Brady Bunch was one of those shows that seemed to always be on in reruns somewhere and gaining popularity as time went on.

I suspect that now, with the overflow of new and interesting (and some not so interesting) TV shows and the relative dearth of actual TV broadcasted reruns (thanks to their availability through Netflix, Amazon, or DVD), shows like The Brady Bunch may be or will lose their cult status at some point in the future.

Still, it was interesting to see this list.  I wasn’t all that surprised to find that the show was originally at best a moderate ratings success, reaching only #34 in the Nielsen Ratings of programs on at the time (remember, back then you had only three main networks, PBS, and maybe another local station on the tube).  After all, the original Star Trek was a ratings loser as well, requiring considerable fan mail to even have a third season before being cancelled.

By the way, one thing that always intrigued me: What happened to the original spouses of Mike and Carol?

I’m thinking wood chipper.

Longmire…cancelled

Count me among those who were shocked by the news yesterday that A&E was cancelling their “most-watched original drama series of all time”, this according to Deadline, after three seasons.

According to that same Deadline article, the producers of the show are shopping it elsewhere.  Normally, that wouldn’t fill me with too much optimism, but given the ratings the show had, getting picked up by another network may turn out to be more possible that for other vanquished series.

Still, what a shame!

If you haven’t seen Longmire, it is a show about the titular Sheriff, a recent widower (there’s much, much to that story!) who, along with his staff, patrols Absaroka County, Wyoming.  What I find so fascinating about the show is that almost all the main characters have interesting backstories that are slowly drawn out and sometimes intersect with the other characters in fascinating ways…all while featuring usually interesting “stand alone” mysteries per episode.

If you haven’t caught the three seasons of the show, I highly recommend you do so, though its painful to think that maybe, just maybe, that’s all we’ll get.

I’ll keep my fingers crossed it won’t be the case!

Perry Mason

There are several “old time” TV shows I really like.  The original Star Trek series.  Mission Impossible.  The Wild, Wild, West.  Mannix.  The Twilight Zone.  The Outer Limits.

I could go on, but let me get to the heart of the matter:  This week Amazon is offering deep discounts on the DVD releases of another all time favorite TV show of mine, Perry Mason.  Unfortunately, and like far too many other series, this one was released in “half season” versions.  If you wanted all nine seasons of the show, therefore, you would have to buy 18 DVD sets.

And brother, they ain’t cheap.

The original price per half season was something like $50, which meant that to get the full series at the original prices cost you a whopping $900 for the entire run.  The prices have since gone down, varying between $30 and $45.  With Amazon’s current sale, you can buy each half season for between $10.99 to $19.99 (Sorry, the sale is now over!).

Over the years I have purchased roughly half the series and, with this sale, was certainly interested in buying the rest at more “reasonable” prices.  The first thing I ordered were seasons 8 and 9.  I was very curious about season nine, especially the second half of it, as from my understanding the folks in front of and behind the cameras knew by that point that the show was ending and decided to go out with a bang.

But before the second half of the ninth series was in the can, there was, at least for a little while, some hope for a 10th season of the series.  Given the year it was filmed -1966- and the fact that pretty much all TV shows by that time were moving toward color, the episode The Case of the Twice Told Twist proved to be a singular curiosity in the series’ 9 year run: It was the only episode filmed in color.

When I received my copies of the series, that was the one I had to see once again.  I had seen the episode a while back and remembered very little of it, other than the fact that the characters I knew so well looked so…odd…in color.  When one gets used to seeing people a certain way, to change their “look” so radically practically invites comparison.

The other thing that I realized was just how much they had all aged.  The Perry Mason TV series began in 1957 and while the main cast were already adults (some older than others) when the show began, the aging process had clearly taken much of the youth that one found in the cast in the early going (in the case of actor Ray Collins, who played the often times deliciously devious Lt. Tragg, he was 68 years old when the show began and passed away in 1965, thus not being around for the final couple of seasons).

Getting back to the color episode itself, The Case of the Twice Told Twist is essentially a riff on Oliver Twist (the episode’s title, suddenly, makes some sense, no?).  It involves an underage gang of car strippers who, natch, strip vehicles down and sell their parts.  Their leader is played by the great Victor Buono, an actor who appeared in many TV series during his lifetime, often portraying the same type of character…a well spoken bon vivant who usually had something devious going on.

While Perry gets a chance to grill Mr. Buono on the stand later in the episode, it is their individual, outside the courtroom meeting roughly half-way through the show that really zings, with Perry and Buono’s characters feeling each other out and offering double edged banter.

As I said, I recalled very little of the episode and, seeing it again, it struck me pretty obvious why: Apart from Mr. Buono and the novelty of color, the episode is pretty dull.  The other guest actors/suspects, while competent, rarely rise to the level of Mr. Buono’s and he’s a relatively small part of the story.  To add insult to injury, the murder mystery itself is curiously lacking.  Most often the show’s fun lies in how many people, including the one Perry Mason is defending, could have been involved in the murder.  In the best of the Perry Mason episodes it is a hoot seeing Mr. Mason whittle through the suspects on the stand or in private, often employing shady legal tactics.  In this case, though, the murderer and the motivation behind it appeared to come out of left field.

Weak sauce indeed.

However, in spite of it all, it is interesting to see an original run episode of Perry Mason in color.  Yeah, the principles might look a lot older and the case itself may not be as compelling as some of the best of them, but it is a curio nonetheless.

Below is that episode’s opening crawl if full color.  Unfortunately, the copy here is pretty bad.  What you get on the DVD is far, far better:

Pat Sajak and the world of conservative game show hosts…

Interesting, though brief, article by Daniel D’Addario for Salon.com regarding Pat Sajak, host of the still popular Wheel of Fortune, who recently made some rather …provocative… twitter posts regarding -of all things!- Global Warming and his apparent lack of concern regarding the same:

http://www.salon.com/2014/05/20/pat-sajaks-vicious-climate-change-denial-and-the-world-of-conservative-game-show-hosts/

I wasn’t too surprised to see Mr. Sajak’s comments, though they were so over the top I can’t help but wonder if he maybe regrets them now.  I was aware that he was a hard right conservative, though I don’t recall where I first read that.  I was a little more surprised to read that several other game show hosts are also very conservative in their ideology.

A strange coincidence?

Not according to Mr. D’Addario, who examines Mr. Sajak’s twitter posts and notes how several other popular (and not quite as popular) game show hosts also share a right leaning.

A number of years ago, probably going on twenty or more, The Wheel of Fortune was in town and somehow I obtained a pair of tickets to see the filming.  I was never, ever, a fan of the show but I was curious to see the process.  So, my wife to be and I headed out to the studio and, along with a large-ish crowd took our seats and watched the “magic”.

The “magic”, it turned out, was rather dull, if only because the crew really had the show, and all it involved with it, so completely nailed down.  In some ways, you couldn’t help but admire the cold efficiency of the routine.  Nonetheless, I missed the lack of any spontaneous reactions from anyone but the show’s winners.  Every word uttered by Pat Sajak appeared scripted, every smile and movement well rehearsed.  As much money as he is/was surely making off the show, I wondered if I could work on something that stripped me down to, basically, a marionette.

The staff, crew, and contestants filmed several episodes in a row, stopping in real time for “commercial breaks” -and using that time to relax or unwind- and at the “end” of the episodes everyone on the stage disappeared, only to reappear a few minutes later when filming was about to resume with a change of clothing obviously designed to give the appearance, when the shows were eventually aired, that an actual day had passed between episodes when it obviously hadn’t.

I don’t know how many episodes were filmed in a row as we were so bored with the proceedings that we left after the “second” episode was finished, but it would not surprise me in the least if at the end of that day and after perhaps not much more than three or four hours of taping they had a week’s worth of episodes.

Hollywood magic.

Gotta love it.